更新时间：11-15 （白鲸）提供原创文章
Abstract: The paper reports an empirical study comparing the effect of listening input, oral output and written output on high school students’ incidental vocabulary acquisition with the Comprehensible Input Hypothesis and the Comprehensible Output Hypothesis as the theoretical framework. The results show that output tasks can better promote incidental vocabulary learning than listening input task. As far as the output tasks are concerned, retelling have greater influence on the target forms in incidental vocabulary learning than dictation. Therefore, in the future in teaching listening, teachers may integrate different forms of tasks following the input task of listening so that more language forms, with vocabulary in particular, may be learned incidentally for better effect of language development.
Key words: Incidental vocabulary acquisition; input; output hypothesis
CONTENTS
Abstract
摘要
1.Introduction..1
1.1 The General Description of the Research
1.2Research Motivations and Objectives
1.3The Overall Structure of the Thesis
2. Literature Review..2
2.1 Definition of Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
2.2 Theoretical Framework: Input Hypothesis and Output Hypothesis
2.3 Related Studies on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
2.3.1 Studies Between Input and Output Vocabulary Learning
2.3.2 Contrast Between Input and Output Activities in Incidental Vocabulary
Acquisition
2.3.3 Studies Comparing Effect of Output Tasks in Incidental Vocabulary
Acquisition
3. Methodology ..5
3.1 Research Question
3.2 Participant
3.3 Listening Material and Target Words
4. Results and Discussion .7
4.1 Results in Immediate Posttest
4.2 Results in Delayed Posttest
5. Conclusion .......9
5.1 Major Findings and Pedagogical Implication
5.2 Limitations of the Study
Bibliography...11
Appendices..12
A. Listening Material
B. Word List