更新时间：10-26 （我的美女老师）提供原创文章
摘要:在我国，刑事侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人权利屡遭侵犯，常常被人诟病。我国现有的刑事强制措施在保障公民权利方面还存在诸多不足，使得犯罪嫌疑人的权利常常受到侵犯却又缺乏救济途径。本文首先列举了刑事侦查中存在的侵犯犯罪嫌疑人权利方面的主要问题。结合我国国情，学习借鉴国外经验，针对这些问题，提出了扩大律师参与侦查活动的范围、赋予犯罪嫌疑人沉默权、提高侦查人员的人权保障意识及素质等具体措施去改革和完善我国刑事强制措施中犯罪嫌疑人的人权保障制度的措施。使犯罪嫌疑人的人权保障机制更加健全。
关键词：刑事侦查，人权保障，制度完善
Abstract:In our country, the rights of criminal suspects often been violated in the criminal investigation stage. It has often been criticized. There are still many inadequacies of the existing criminal coercive measures in the protection of civil rights. It makes the rights of criminal suspects often be infringed in another way the channels for relief are exile. This article enumerates the main problem of the rights of the criminal investigation in violation of criminal suspects at first. According to our national conditions, learn from foreign experience, aimed at these problems, put forward to enlarge the scope of lawyers in the investigation activities, to give the suspect the right to silence, enhance investigation officers of the guarantee of human rights consciousness and quality of specific measures to reform and improve the measures of the system of protection of human rights of criminal suspects of our country’s Criminal Coercive Measures. It makes suspect's human rights protection mechanism more robust.
Key words: Criminal investigation, The guarantee of human rights, Perfect system
犯罪嫌疑人在刑事诉讼程序中尤其在侦查阶段，应当受到人道的对待，这是作为一个人最基本的权利。犯罪嫌疑人是侦查阶段的主体，依法享有权利保障来防止侦查措施对他的合法权益造成的伤害，并尽快从侦查程序中解脱出来以免程序之累。[韩德明．侦查程序价值论[J]．山东公安专科学校学报，2004年第6期．]我国历年来“重实体、轻程序”，在侦查阶段，侦查机关为了查明案情，搜集证据，其侦查行为都是在秘密状态下进行，并不向社会公开。侦查机关在强烈追求犯罪事实真相过程中，容易导致犯罪嫌疑人人权被侵犯现象发生。
从国家法治的要求和在侦查程序价值体现分析，近年来我国学者和立法者都积极倡导保障犯罪嫌疑人的人权，犯罪嫌疑人在侦查阶段，应当受到人道的对待，不得对其使用刑讯逼供等不人道的侦查行为；在犯罪嫌疑人被羁押期间，不得对犯罪嫌疑人使用酷刑，不得施以不人道的或侮辱性的处罚。