更新时间：08-14 （致青春郑微）提供原创文章
摘要:民事诉讼证明标准是衡量法官形成内心确信的尺度。“客观真实”的民事诉讼证明标准过于单一，在司法实践中难以实现，已不再适应我国纷繁复杂的诉讼证明活动，更加不适应民事审判的需要，因此构建新的证明标准显得尤为必要和紧迫。本文通过比较分析了两大法系的盖然性证明标准，探讨两大法系关于民事诉讼证明标准的的制定及理论研究，及其对构建我国民事诉讼证明标准的借鉴意义，提出建构符合我国民事诉讼时代特征的的高度盖然性证明标准。
关键词：民事诉讼的证明标准；客观真实；高度盖然性
Abstract:Civil standard of proof is a measure for the judge become inner conviction. The civil standard of objective reality is too single，and it's difficult to achieve in the judicial practice. The civil standard of objective fact had no longer meet the complex litigation to prove our activities and more suited the needs of the civil trial, establishment of a new standard of proof is very important and urgent.In this paper, I compare and analysis the probability standar of proof of two legal systems, investigate the formulation and theory of the two legal systems on the civil standard of proof, and the reference for the construction of our civil standard of proof，formulate the high degree of probability standard of proof，which meet the characteristics of the times of Civil Procedure.
Key words: civil standard of proof；objective reality；high probability
证明标准在民事诉讼证明过程中具有重要的意义，它是诉讼证明活动的方向和准绳，指导者当事人和事实认定者实施正确的诉讼行为。对于案件事实能够证明到什么程度，或者说达到证明标准的事实的性质是什么或者应当是什么，国内外在学理上有不同的理论观点，而我国对于证明标准的立法只体现在原则性规定或者立法指导思想上，缺乏具体明确的法律条文规定，给司法实践带来诸多不便，严重妨碍了司法的效率与公正。因此，重新建构符合时代发展的证明标准十分紧要。