更新时间：08-25 （致青春郑微）提供原创文章
摘要:本文通过分析非法证据排除规则的概念、立法价值和我国非法证据排除规则的现状，指出非法证据排除规则存在的非法言词证据的具体范围尚不明确，法庭难以加以界定、非法证据的提出时机并非最佳时机、控方证明供述合法取得的证明方法存在缺陷、“证据补强”方式不尽合理的问题，在借鉴英国、德国和美国的对非法证据的解决方式的基础上，对我国在非法证据排除规则的实施提出完善建议。
关键词：非法证据排除规则；立法价值；制度构建
Abstract:This article by analysis illegal evidence excluded rules of concept , and legislative value and in China illegal evidence excluded rules of status , pointed out that illegal evidence excluded rules exists of illegal words evidence of specific range is does not clear , court difficult to be defined , and illegal evidence of made time is not best time , and controlled party proved for in legitimate made of proved method exists defects , and " evidence supplement strong " way not reasonable of problem , in reference British , and Germany and us of on illegal evidence of solution way of Foundation Shang , on in China in illegal evidence excluded rules of implementation made perfect recommendations.
Key words: Eclusionary Rule of IllEegally Obtained Evidence；feasibility；system construction
虽然我国非法证据排除规则制度设计有非法言词证据的具体范围不明确，非法证据的提出时机不合理，空腹证明供述合法取得的方法存在缺陷，“证据补强”方式不恰当等不合理之处，并且配套机制还不够完善。但是，非法证据排除规则是符合世界发展潮流的产物,具有深厚的理论基础,具有保障人权，防止权力滥用，维护社会正义和法律权威的立法价值，是一项符合刑法基本原则和社会发展需要的司法创新之举,是转变目前侦查过程中出现的各种非法手段状况的契机。它毕竟是一种新生事物,仍需实践中得到检验和发展。因此,借鉴外国的经验，在我国建立以保障人权为基础，以有效打击犯罪维护社会秩序稳定为目的，构建合理的非法证据排除原则制度还需要一个逐步发展的过程。