更新时间：04-24 （soso）提供原创文章
摘要：抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪是司法实践中常见的两种犯罪。尽管刑法条文规定明确，但实务中抢劫罪与敲诈勒索罪的认定界限模糊，有时难以区分。一般认为两罪的犯罪主观方面均为直接故意，犯罪主体均为一般主体，犯罪客体也基本相同。就两罪区别而言，单一行为只有具备“强制人身”、“强取财物”两个特征，才能构成抢劫罪；行为是复行为时，只要手段行为没有体现以实施暴力相威胁，就不构成抢劫罪，可能构成敲诈勒索罪；只要手段行为没有体现以当场实施暴力进行人身强制，就不构成抢劫罪，可能构成敲诈勒索罪；只要手段行为没有达到足以抑制被害人反抗的程度，就不构成抢劫罪，可能构成敲诈勒索罪。
关键词：抢劫 敲诈勒索 暴力 当场 犯罪构成
Abstract：Robbery and extortion are two kinds of common judicial crimes .Despite the clear provisions of the Criminal Law, the practice of robbery and extortion Crime blurred, and it’s so difficult to differentiate between extortion and robbery. Generally speaking, that subjective aspects of the two crimes are the direct intention, a common subject , and what’s more ,the objects of the two crimes are also the same. As to the difference between the two crimes, a single act must be provided with getting the property forcely.In order to constitute robbery; behavior is a complex behavior, as long as the means to implement the behavior does not reflect the threat of violence to does not constitute robbery may constitute extortion; as long as the means of behavior does not reflect a personal violence to force the spot, do not constitute a robbery, may constitute extortion; as long as the means to act against the victim is not enough to suppress the extent of not constitute robbery may constitute extortion.
Key words:Robbery Extortion Violence Crime constitution On the spot